Re: why not parallel seq scan for slow functions

Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-09-13T04:09:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5 September 2017 at 14:04, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I started with a quick review ... a couple of comments below :
>
> - * If this is a baserel, consider gathering any partial paths we may have
> - * created for it.  (If we tried to gather inheritance children, we could
> + * If this is a baserel and not the only rel, consider gathering any
> + * partial paths we may have created for it.  (If we tried to gather
>
>   /* Create GatherPaths for any useful partial paths for rel */
> -  generate_gather_paths(root, rel);
> +  if (lev < levels_needed)
> +     generate_gather_paths(root, rel, NULL);
>
> I think at the above two places, and may be in other place also, it's
> better to mention the reason why we should generate the gather path
> only if it's not the only rel.
>

I think the comment you are looking is present where we are calling
generate_gather_paths in grouping_planner. Instead of adding same or
similar comment at multiple places, how about if we just say something
like "See in grouping_planner where we generate gather paths" at all
other places?

> ----------
>
> -       if (rel->reloptkind == RELOPT_BASEREL)
> -               generate_gather_paths(root, rel);
> +       if (rel->reloptkind == RELOPT_BASEREL &&
> root->simple_rel_array_size > 2)
> +               generate_gather_paths(root, rel, NULL);
>
> Above, in case it's a partitioned table, root->simple_rel_array_size
> includes the child rels. So even if it's a simple select without a
> join rel, simple_rel_array_size would be > 2, and so gather path would
> be generated here for the root table, and again in grouping_planner().
>

Yeah, that could be a problem.  I think we should ensure that there is
no append rel list by checking root->append_rel_list.  Can you think
of a better way to handle it?

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com


Commits

  1. Rewrite the code that applies scan/join targets to paths.

  2. Teach create_projection_plan to omit projection where possible.

  3. Make the upper part of the planner work by generating and comparing Paths.