Re: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep

Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: "osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com" <osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Markus Wanner <markus.wanner@enterprisedb.com>
Date: 2021-06-09T08:48:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 12:03 PM osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com
<osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, June 9, 2021 12:06 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 6:24 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > 3) Should [user] catalog tables be catalog tables or user catalog
> > > tables [user] catalog tables
> > >
> >
> > The third point is not clear. Can you please elaborate by quoting the exact
> > change from the patch?
> IIUC, he means to replace all descriptions "[user] catalog tables"
> with "catalog tables or user catalog tables" in the patch,
> because seemingly we don't use square brackets to describe optional clause in
> normal descriptions(like outside of synopsis and I don't find any example for this).
> But, even if so, I would like to keep the current square brackets description,
> which makes sentence short and simple.
>

+1.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



Commits

  1. Doc: Update caveats in synchronous logical replication.

  2. Document a few caveats in synchronous logical replication.

  3. Update the docs and comments for decoding of prepared xacts.

  4. Allow decoding at prepare time in ReorderBuffer.

  5. Documentation for logical decoding.