Re: Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Cc: "shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com" <shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com>,
Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, Melih Mutlu <m.melihmutlu@gmail.com>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>, "Takamichi Osumi (Fujitsu)" <osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-03-23T05:48:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format.
- ecb696527c01 16.0 landed
-
Common function for percent placeholder replacement
- c96de2ce1782 16.0 cited
-
Doc: add XML ID attributes to <sectN> and <varlistentry> tags.
- 78ee60ed84bb 16.0 cited
-
Re-order disable_on_error in tab-complete.
- d547f7cf5efc 16.0 cited
-
Make subscription tests pass with log_error_verbosity=verbose
- 19408aae7fa2 15.0 cited
-
Weaken type-OID-matching checks in array_recv and record_recv.
- 670c0a1d474b 14.0 cited
-
Allow logical replication to transfer data in binary format.
- 9de77b545313 14.0 cited
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 4:06 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > The patch looks mostly good to me. However, I have one > > question/comment as follows: > > > > - <varlistentry> > > + <varlistentry id="sql-createsubscription-binary" xreflabel="binary"> > > <term><literal>binary</literal> (<type>boolean</type>)</term> > > <listitem> > > > > To allow references to the binary option, we add the varlistentry id > > here. It looks slightly odd to me to add id for just one entry, see > > commit 78ee60ed84bb3a1cf0b6bd9a715dcbcf252a90f5 where we have > > purposefully added ids to allow future references. Shall we add id to > > other options as well on this page? > > I have analyzed same points and made patch that could be applied atop v19-0001. > Please check 0002 patch. > Pushed the 0001. It may be better to start a separate thread for 0002. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.