Re: ReplicationSlotRelease() crashes when the instance is in the single user mode
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Date: 2025-02-22T04:58:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 6:21 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
<kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> Dear hackers,
>
> Thanks everyone for giving comments! PSA new version.
> What's new:
>
> - Message format was modified to {"cannot use function %s in single-user mode", "function_name"}
> - Reporting funcname was adjusted based on the parameters. ternary operator was used.
> - Guard was added for functions in logicalfunction.c.
>
Shouldn't such a check be present in the CheckSlotPermissions() kind
of function to perform it in the central place?
> For now, functions for replication origin and replication messages were retained.
> I can handle them after the discussion.
>
Which other functions do we see similar restrictions? I checked
"sequence manipulation functions" (1), and "Transaction ID and
Snapshot Information Functions" (2) but couldn't see similar
restrictions.
(1) - https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-sequence.html
(2) - https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-info.html#FUNCTIONS-INFO-SNAPSHOT
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
Commits
-
Fix assertion failure with replication slot release in single-user mode
- 8ed079cad824 13.23 landed
- 32d388d00f9f 14.20 landed
- 818be9b73c94 15.15 landed
- fea1cc3f75ff 16.11 landed
- 07a302387176 17.7 landed
- ea1c6b0b0aec 18.0 landed
- 1f2e51e3c7c2 19 (unreleased) landed