Re: Exit walsender before confirming remote flush in logical replication

Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

To: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>

Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, "Takamichi Osumi (Fujitsu)" <osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, "sawada.mshk@gmail.com" <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, "michael@paquier.xyz" <michael@paquier.xyz>, "peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com" <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>, "dilipbalaut@gmail.com" <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>, "andres@anarazel.de" <andres@anarazel.de>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>

Date: 2023-02-10T12:15:01Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

Add wal_sender_shutdown_timeout GUC to limit shutdown wait for replication
- a8f45dee9176 19 (unreleased) landed
pg_upgrade: Add --copy option
- 746915c68669 16.0 cited
Prevent possibility of panics during shutdown checkpoint.
- c6c333436491 10.0 cited
Support clean switchover.
- 985bd7d49726 9.4.0 cited

On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 5:24 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
<kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>

Can't we have this option just as a bool (like shutdown_immediate)?
Why do we want to keep multiple modes?

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.