Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences, take 2
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Date: 2023-10-14T11:53:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Migrate logical slots to the new node during an upgrade.
- 29d0a77fa660 17.0 cited
-
Make test_decoding ddl.out shorter
- d6677b93c79b 17.0 landed
- c5c5832600e9 14.9 landed
- b1dc946eee3d 16.0 landed
- 3bb8b9342f8a 15.4 landed
-
Fix snapshot handling in logicalmsg_decode
- 949ac32e1267 15.3 landed
- 8b9cbd42b61f 14.8 landed
- 4df581fa0f4b 13.11 landed
- 497f863f0598 12.15 landed
- 8de91ebf2ac1 11.20 landed
- 7fe1aa991b62 16.0 landed
-
doc: Adjust a few more references to "postmaster"
- 17e72ec45d31 16.0 cited
-
Revert "Logical decoding of sequences"
- 2c7ea57e56ca 15.0 cited
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 9:03 PM Tomas Vondra
<tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/25/23 12:20, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > I have used the debugger to reproduce this as it needs quite some
> > coordination. I just wanted to see if the sequence can go backward and
> > didn't catch up completely before the sequence state is marked
> > 'ready'. On the publisher side, I created a publication with a table
> > and a sequence. Then did the following steps:
> > SELECT nextval('s') FROM generate_series(1,50);
> > insert into t1 values(1);
> > SELECT nextval('s') FROM generate_series(51,150);
> >
> > Then on the subscriber side with some debugging aid, I could find the
> > values in the sequence shown in the previous email. Sorry, I haven't
> > recorded each and every step but, if you think it helps, I can again
> > try to reproduce it and share the steps.
> >
>
> Amit, can you try to reproduce this backwards movement with the latest
> version of the patch?
>
I lost touch with this patch but IIRC the quoted problem per se
shouldn't occur after the idea to use page LSN instead of slot's LSN
for synchronization between sync and apply worker.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.