Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add a test for commit ac0e33136a using the injection point.
- 8a695d7998be 18.0 landed
-
Invalidate inactive replication slots.
- ac0e33136abc 18.0 landed
-
Fix incorrect slot type in BuildTupleHashTableExt
- d96d1d5152f3 18.0 cited
-
Allow synced slots to have their inactive_since.
- 6f132ed693b6 17.0 landed
-
Change last_inactive_time to inactive_since in pg_replication_slots.
- 6d49c8d4b4f4 17.0 landed
-
Track last_inactive_time in pg_replication_slots.
- a11f330b5584 17.0 landed
-
Track invalidation_reason in pg_replication_slots.
- 6ae701b4378d 17.0 landed
-
Add option force_initdb to PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster:init()
- ff9e1e764fcc 17.0 cited
-
Add a failover option to subscriptions.
- 776621a5e479 17.0 cited
-
Allow setting failover property in the replication command.
- 73292404370c 17.0 cited
-
Allow to enable failover property for replication slots via SQL API.
- c393308b69d2 17.0 cited
-
Track conflict_reason in pg_replication_slots.
- 007693f2a3ac 17.0 cited
-
Log messages for replication slot acquisition and release.
- 7c3fb505b14e 17.0 cited
-
Remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age
- 1118cd37eb61 16.0 cited
-
Fix corruption due to vacuum_defer_cleanup_age underflowing 64bit xids
- be504a3e974d 16.0 cited
-
meson: Add initial version of meson based build system
- e6927270cd18 16.0 cited
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 10:17 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 8:02 AM Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > 2. > > > + * Flush all replication slots to disk. Also, invalidate obsolete slots during > > > + * non-shutdown checkpoint. > > > * > > > * It is convenient to flush dirty replication slots at the time of checkpoint. > > > * Additionally, in case of a shutdown checkpoint, we also identify the slots > > > @@ -1924,6 +2007,45 @@ CheckPointReplicationSlots(bool is_shutdown) > > > > > > Can we try and see how the patch looks if we try to invalidate the > > > slot due to idle time at the same time when we are trying to > > > invalidate due to WAL? > > > > > > > I'll consider the suggested change in the next version. > > > > FYI, we discussed this previously (1), but the conclusion that it > won't help much (as it will not help to remove WAL immediately) is > incorrect, especially if we do what is suggested now. > The above sentence is incomplete. Let me re-write it. We discussed this previously, but the conclusion that it won't help much (as it will not help to remove WAL immediately) at the time shutdown checkpoint is incorrect, especially if we do what is suggested now. So, we should try to invalidate the slots even during shutdown checkpoints. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.