Horton

Re: doc fix for pg_stat_activity.backend_type

Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: jcnaylor@gmail.com
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-11-15T05:49:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 5:03 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:37 PM John Naylor <jcnaylor@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > +      In addition, extensions may have additional types.
> > >
> > > How about: "In addition, background workers registered by extensions
> > > may have additional types."?
> >
> > Sounds good to me -- I've included this language.
> >
>
> LGTM.  I will wait for a day or so, if nobody has any comments, I will
> push your patch.
>

Pushed, thanks for working on this.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Commits

  1. Fix the omission in docs.

  2. Add background worker type

  3. Show more processes in pg_stat_activity.