Re: Assertion failure in SnapBuildInitialSnapshot()
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Date: 2023-01-27T05:24:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 8:17 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > > The same assertion failure has been reported on another thread[1]. > Since I could reproduce this issue several times in my environment > I've investigated the root cause. > > I think there is a race condition of updating > procArray->replication_slot_xmin by CreateInitDecodingContext() and > LogicalConfirmReceivedLocation(). > > What I observed in the test was that a walsender process called: > SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() > LogicalIncreaseXminForSlot() > LogicalConfirmReceivedLocation() > ReplicationSlotsComputeRequiredXmin(false). > > In ReplicationSlotsComputeRequiredXmin() it acquired the > ReplicationSlotControlLock and got 0 as the minimum xmin since there > was no wal sender having effective_xmin. > What about the current walsender process which is processing running_xacts via SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts()? Isn't that walsender slot's effective_xmin have a non-zero value? If not, then why? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix a race condition in updating procArray->replication_slot_xmin.
- 2a5225b99d76 19 (unreleased) landed
- fd7c86cfaf13 18.2 landed
- 123b851abdac 17.8 landed
- 82146672261d 16.12 landed
- fa557d3005e7 15.16 landed
- 57048d6e1733 14.21 landed
-
Don't retreat slot's confirmed_flush LSN.
- ad5eaf390c58 18.0 cited
-
Add additional checks while creating the initial decoding snapshot.
- 240e0dbacd39 16.0 landed