Re: Support logical replication of DDLs

Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: "houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Cc: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>, "wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com" <wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com>, Runqi Tian <runqidev@gmail.com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, li jie <ggysxcq@gmail.com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>, rajesh singarapu <rajesh.rs0541@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Zheng Li <zhengli10@gmail.com>
Date: 2023-04-10T11:20:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Add a run_as_owner option to subscriptions.

  2. Refactor pgoutput_change().

  3. Print the correct aliases for DML target tables in ruleutils.

  4. Fix object identity string for transforms

  5. Add grantable MAINTAIN privilege and pg_maintain role.

  6. Get rid of recursion-marker values in enum AlterTableType

  7. Release cache tuple when no longer needed

  8. Empty search_path in logical replication apply worker and walsender.

  9. Refactor format_type APIs to be more modular

  10. Use wrappers of PG_DETOAST_DATUM_PACKED() more.

On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 8:52 AM houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com
<houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry, there was a miss when rebasing the patch which could cause the
> CFbot to fail and here is the correct patch set.
>

I see the following note in the patch: "Note: For ATTACH/DETACH
PARTITION, we haven't added extra logic on the subscriber to handle
the case where the table on the publisher is a PARTITIONED TABLE while
the target table on the subscriber side is a NORMAL table. We will
research this more and improve it later." and wonder what should we do
about this. I can think of the following possibilities: (a) Convert a
non-partitioned table to a partitioned one and then attach the
partition; (b) Add the partition as a separate new table; (c) give an
error that table types mismatch. For Detach partition, I don't see
much possibility than giving an error that no such partition exists or
something like that. Even for the Attach operation, I prefer (c) as
the other options don't seem logical to me and may add more complexity
to this work.

Thoughts?

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.