Horton

Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats

Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-02-21T05:08:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 10:07 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
>
> I also still think that _worker shouldn't be part of any of the naming
> here.
>

Okay, the other options that comes to mind for this are:
pg_subscription_replication_error, or
pg_subscription_lreplication_error, or pg_subscription_lrep_error? We
can use similar naming at another place (view) if required.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

Commits

  1. Reconsider pg_stat_subscription_workers view.

  2. Add a view to show the stats of subscription workers.