Re: Logical replication timeout problem

Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861@gmail.com>
Cc: Tang, Haiying/唐 海英 <tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-01-14T12:02:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 3:47 PM Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If I can follow you, I have to make the following changes:
>

No, not like that but we can try that way as well to see if that helps
to avoid your problem. Am, I understanding correctly even after
modification, you are seeing the problem. Can you try by calling
WalSndKeepaliveIfNecessary() instead of WalSndKeepalive()?

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



Commits

  1. Fix the logical replication timeout during large DDLs.

  2. Fix the logical replication timeout during large transactions.

  3. Rethink the delay-checkpoint-end mechanism in the back-branches.

  4. Revert "Logical decoding of sequences"

  5. Skip empty transactions for logical replication.

  6. Allow specifying column lists for logical replication

  7. Add decoding of sequences to built-in replication

  8. Fix ABI break introduced by commit 4daa140a2f.

  9. Lag tracking for logical replication