Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add a test for commit ac0e33136a using the injection point.
- 8a695d7998be 18.0 landed
-
Invalidate inactive replication slots.
- ac0e33136abc 18.0 landed
-
Fix incorrect slot type in BuildTupleHashTableExt
- d96d1d5152f3 18.0 cited
-
Allow synced slots to have their inactive_since.
- 6f132ed693b6 17.0 landed
-
Change last_inactive_time to inactive_since in pg_replication_slots.
- 6d49c8d4b4f4 17.0 landed
-
Track last_inactive_time in pg_replication_slots.
- a11f330b5584 17.0 landed
-
Track invalidation_reason in pg_replication_slots.
- 6ae701b4378d 17.0 landed
-
Add option force_initdb to PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster:init()
- ff9e1e764fcc 17.0 cited
-
Add a failover option to subscriptions.
- 776621a5e479 17.0 cited
-
Allow setting failover property in the replication command.
- 73292404370c 17.0 cited
-
Allow to enable failover property for replication slots via SQL API.
- c393308b69d2 17.0 cited
-
Track conflict_reason in pg_replication_slots.
- 007693f2a3ac 17.0 cited
-
Log messages for replication slot acquisition and release.
- 7c3fb505b14e 17.0 cited
-
Remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age
- 1118cd37eb61 16.0 cited
-
Fix corruption due to vacuum_defer_cleanup_age underflowing 64bit xids
- be504a3e974d 16.0 cited
-
meson: Add initial version of meson based build system
- e6927270cd18 16.0 cited
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 8:49 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> InvalidatePossiblyObsoleteSlot:
>
> 2.
> + if (possible_causes & RS_INVAL_IDLE_TIMEOUT)
> + {
> + /*
> + * Assign the current time here to avoid system call overhead
> + * while holding the spinlock in subsequent code.
> + */
> + now = GetCurrentTimestamp();
> + }
> +
>
> I felt that any minuscule benefit gained from having this conditional
> 'now' assignment is outweighed by the subsequent confusion/doubt
> caused by passing around a 'now' to other functions where it may or
> may not still be zero depending on different processing. IMO we should
> just remove all doubts and always assign it so that "now always means
> now".
>
I think we shouldn't pass now to another function, but rather do all
required computations in the caller (probably in a separate inline
function). And keep the above code as is.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.