Thread

Re: Include schema-qualified names in publication error messages.

Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> — 2026-05-05T10:42:08Z

On Tue, May 5, 2026 at 4:02 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Now, we also need to decide whether to backpatch the relevant change
> > to back-branches. It seems we didn't get the bug-report yet but
> > clearly what we do currently is not correct. So, we should ideally
> > backpatch it and in the back branches we don't need to expose it.
> > OTOH, as it is reported and is not a big issue, so we can keep this as
> > a HEAD only change as well. If we want to keep this as a HEAD only
> > change then shall we wait for PG20 branch to open or go for current
> > HEAD itself? What do you and or others think on this matter?
>
> I think we should apply in PG19. Although back-patching isn't
> critical, since we already have an opportunity to fix it in PG19, why
> not push it early?
>

I also think we should push it for PG19 especially because the EXCEPT
feature increased the usage of relation names without schema-name in
error messages. However, as we are past feature freeze, I wanted to
know the opinion of others as well.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.