Horton

Re: Fix for parallel BTree initialization bug

Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: "Jameson, Hunter 'James'" <hunjmes@amazon.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org>, Rahila Syed <rahila.syed@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: 2020-09-14T12:37:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 4:41 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 8:07 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
> >
> I have tested this on HEAD. It would be great if you can verify in
> back branches as well. I'll also do it before commit.
>

I am planning to push this tomorrow after doing testing on
back-branches. Let me know if you have any comments.


-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

Commits

  1. Update parallel BTree scan state when the scan keys can't be satisfied.

  2. btree: Support parallel index scans.