Re: doc: update PL/pgSQL sample loop function
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Cc: Ian Barwick <ian.barwick@2ndquadrant.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-09-01T03:39:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:07 AM Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi > > čt 29. 8. 2019 v 5:03 odesílatel Ian Barwick <ian.barwick@2ndquadrant.com> napsal: >> >> Hi >> >> Here: >> >> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/plpgsql-control-structures.html#PLPGSQL-RECORDS-ITERATING >> >> we have a sample PL/PgSQL function (dating from at least 7.2) demonstrating >> query result loops, which refreshes some pseudo materialized views stored in >> a user-defined table. >> >> As we've had proper materialized views since 9.3, I thought it might >> be nice to update this with a self-contained sample which can be used >> as-is; see attached patch. >> >> (As a side note the current sample function contains a couple of "%s" >> placeholders which should be just "%"; a quick search of plpgsql.sgml >> shows this is the only place they occur). >> >> Will submit to the next commitfest. > > +1 > The current example shows the usage of looping in plpgsql, so as such there is no correctness issue, but OTOH there is no harm in updating the example as proposed by Ian Barwick. Does anyone else see any problem with this idea? If we agree to proceed with this update, it might be better to backpatch it for the sake of consistency though I am not sure about that. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Commits
-
Doc: Update PL/pgSQL sample function in plpgsql.sgml.
- 1f705e68ee4f 9.4.25 landed
- 1ae57833e26f 9.5.20 landed
- 2db5262549ef 9.6.16 landed
- a477f250a3ea 10.11 landed
- 1fcb73fe72dc 11.6 landed
- fef55c569eed 12.0 landed
- 9b3c8f07ff3f 13.0 landed