Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 4:16 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 3:26 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 2:32 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Users can use a publication like "create publication pub1 for table
> > > t1(c1, c2), t2;" where they want t1's generated column to be published
> > > but not for t2. They can specify the generated column name in the
> > > column list of t1 in that case even though the rest of the tables
> > > won't publish generated columns.
> >
> > Agreed.
> >
> > I think that users can use the publish_generated_column option when
> > they want to publish all generated columns, instead of specifying all
> > the columns in the column list. It's another advantage of this option
> > that it will also include the future generated columns.
> >
>
> OK. Let me give some examples below to help understand this idea.
>
> Please correct me if these are incorrect.
>
> Examples, when publish_generated_columns=true:
>
> CREATE PUBLICATION pub1 FOR t1(a,b,gen2), t2 WITH
> (publish_generated_columns=true)
> t1 -> publishes a, b, gen2 (e.g. what column list says)
> t2 -> publishes c, d + ALSO gen1, gen2
>
> CREATE PUBLICATION pub1 FOR t1, t2(gen1) WITH (publish_generated_columns=true)
> t1 -> publishes a, b + ALSO gen1, gen2
> t2 -> publishes gen1 (e.g. what column list says)
>
These two could be controversial because one could expect that if
"publish_generated_columns=true" then publish generated columns
irrespective of whether they are mentioned in column_list. I am of the
opinion that column_list should take priority the results should be as
mentioned by you but let us see if anyone thinks otherwise.
>
> ======
>
> The idea LGTM, although now the parameter name
> ('publish_generated_columns') seems a bit misleading since sometimes
> generated columns get published "irrespective of the option".
>
> So, I think the original parameter name 'include_generated_columns'
> might be better here because IMO "include" seems more like "add them
> if they are not already specified", which is exactly what this idea is
> doing.
>
I still prefer 'publish_generated_columns' because it matches with
other publication option names. One can also deduce from
'include_generated_columns' that add all the generated columns even
when some of them are specified in column_list.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Doc: Generated column replication.
- 6252b1eaf82b 18.0 landed
-
Rename pubgencols_type to pubgencols in pg_publication.
- 75eb9766ec20 18.0 landed
-
Doc: Fix column name in pg_publication catalog.
- 117f9f328e0f 18.0 landed
-
Fix buildfarm failure introduced by commit e65dbc9927.
- b35434b134b1 18.0 landed
-
Change publication's publish_generated_columns option type to enum.
- e65dbc9927fb 18.0 landed
-
Fix \dRp+ output when describing publications with a lower server version.
- 991974bb4888 18.0 landed
-
Replicate generated columns when 'publish_generated_columns' is set.
- 7054186c4ebe 18.0 landed
-
Doc: Update the behavior of generated columns in Logical Replication.
- 5b0c46ea0932 18.0 landed
-
Replicate generated columns when specified in the column list.
- 745217a051a9 18.0 landed
-
Doc: Generated columns are skipped for logical replication.
- 7a089f6e6a14 17.0 cited