Re: Is this a problem in GenericXLogFinish()?
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>,
Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-02-07T08:38:42Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 1:33 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 07:57:09AM +0000, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) wrote: > > You are right. Based on the previous discussions, PageSetLSN() must be called > > after the MakeBufferDirty(). REGBUF_NO_CHANGE has been introduced for skipping > > these requirements. Definitevely, no_change buffers must not be PageSetLSN()'d. > > Other pages, e.g., metabuf, has already been followed the rule. > > At quick glance, this v2 seems kind of right to me: you are setting > the page LSN only when the page is registered in the record and > actually dirtied. > Thanks for the report and looking into it. Pushed! -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
Commits
-
Fix inconsistency with replay of hash squeeze record for clean buffers
- f56a9def71bb 17.0 landed
-
Set LSN for wbuf in _hash_freeovflpage() iff wbuf is modified.
- aa5edbe379d6 17.0 landed
-
Fix an uninitialized access in hash_xlog_squeeze_page().
- f66fcc5cd616 17.0 landed
-
Use REGBUF_NO_CHANGE at one more place in the hash index.
- 861f86beea1c 17.0 landed
-
Assert that buffers are marked dirty before XLogRegisterBuffer().
- 00d7fb5e2e39 17.0 landed
-
Fix bug in GenericXLogFinish().
- 04f0baa85865 11.22 landed
- 6dbd01b9fdad 12.17 landed
- 469d367bee2f 13.13 landed
- 6615bb95af2d 14.10 landed
- b9bb02620d4b 15.5 landed
- b8963e8a2854 16.1 landed
- ef74c7197c04 17.0 landed
-
Improve hash index bucket split behavior.
- 6d46f4783efe 10.0 cited