Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences, take 2
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>,
Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>,
Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Date: 2023-11-30T11:56:22Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Migrate logical slots to the new node during an upgrade.
- 29d0a77fa660 17.0 cited
-
Make test_decoding ddl.out shorter
- d6677b93c79b 17.0 landed
- c5c5832600e9 14.9 landed
- b1dc946eee3d 16.0 landed
- 3bb8b9342f8a 15.4 landed
-
Fix snapshot handling in logicalmsg_decode
- 949ac32e1267 15.3 landed
- 8b9cbd42b61f 14.8 landed
- 4df581fa0f4b 13.11 landed
- 497f863f0598 12.15 landed
- 8de91ebf2ac1 11.20 landed
- 7fe1aa991b62 16.0 landed
-
doc: Adjust a few more references to "postmaster"
- 17e72ec45d31 16.0 cited
-
Revert "Logical decoding of sequences"
- 2c7ea57e56ca 15.0 cited
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 5:28 AM Tomas Vondra
<tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> 3) "bad case" - small transactions that generate a lot of relfilenodes
>
> select alter_sequence();
>
> where the function is defined like this (I did create 1000 sequences
> before the test):
>
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION alter_sequence() RETURNS void AS $$
> DECLARE
> v INT;
> BEGIN
> v := 1 + (random() * 999)::int;
> execute format('alter sequence s%s restart with 1000', v);
> perform nextval('s');
> END;
> $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
>
> This performs terribly, but it's entirely unrelated to sequences.
> Current master has exactly the same problem, if transactions do DDL.
> Like this, for example:
>
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION create_table() RETURNS void AS $$
> DECLARE
> v INT;
> BEGIN
> v := 1 + (random() * 999)::int;
> execute format('create table t%s (a int)', v);
> execute format('drop table t%s', v);
> insert into t values (1);
> END;
> $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
>
> This has the same impact on master. The perf report shows this:
>
> --98.06%--pg_logical_slot_get_changes_guts
> |
> --97.88%--LogicalDecodingProcessRecord
> |
> --97.56%--xact_decode
> |
> --97.51%--DecodeCommit
> |
> |--91.92%--SnapBuildCommitTxn
> | |
> | --91.65%--SnapBuildBuildSnapshot
> | |
> | --91.14%--pg_qsort
>
> The sequence decoding is maybe ~1%. The reason why SnapBuildSnapshot
> takes so long is because:
>
> -----------------
> Breakpoint 1, SnapBuildBuildSnapshot (builder=0x21f60f8)
> at snapbuild.c:498
> 498 + sizeof(TransactionId) * builder->committed.xcnt
> (gdb) p builder->committed.xcnt
> $4 = 11532
> -----------------
>
> And with each iteration it grows by 1.
>
Can we somehow avoid this either by keeping DDL-related xacts open or
aborting them? Also, will it make any difference to use setval as
do_setval() seems to be logging each time?
If possible, can you share the scripts? Kuroda-San has access to the
performance machine, he may be able to try it as well.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.