Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: depesz@depesz.com
Cc: pgsql-bugs mailing list <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-10-18T11:27:52Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix a possibility of logical replication slot's restart_lsn going backwards.
- e5ed873b1b4a 18.0 landed
- 568e78a653ee 17.2 landed
- f353911337cf 16.6 landed
- 91771b3fbbc3 15.10 landed
- 26c4e8968690 14.15 landed
- 15dc1abb17dd 13.18 landed
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 2:43 PM hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 10:35:17AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > > > Wal file has been removed. Please note that the file was, as shown earlier, still within "restart_lsn" as visibile on pg12/bionic. > > This is quite strange and I am not able to see the reason why this can > > happen. The only way to debug this problem that comes to mind is to > > add more LOGS around the code that removes the WAL files. For example, > > we can try to print the value of minimumslotLSN (keep) and logSegNo in > > KeepLogSeg(). > > That would require changing pg sources, I think, recompiling, and > retrying? > Yes. BTW, are you on the latest release of pg12, if not then you can once check the release notes to see if there is any related bug fix in the later releases? Is this problem reproducible? If so, can you find out why there are multiple time connection issues between walsender and walreceiver? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.