Re: wake up logical workers after ALTER SUBSCRIPTION
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Melih Mutlu <m.melihmutlu@gmail.com>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-01-05T05:27:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 6:19 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 10:12:19AM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote: > > From the discussion thus far, it sounds like the alternatives are to 1) add > > a global flag that causes wal_retrieve_retry_interval to be bypassed for > > all workers or to 2) add a hash map in the launcher and a > > restart_immediately flag in each worker slot. I'll go ahead and create a > > patch for 2 since it seems like the most complete solution, and we can > > evaluate whether the complexity seems appropriate. > > Here is a first attempt at adding a hash table to the launcher and a > restart_immediately flag in each worker slot. This provides a similar > speedup to lowering wal_retrieve_retry_interval to 1ms. I've noted a > couple of possible race conditions in comments, but none of them seemed > particularly egregious. Ideally, we'd put the hash table in shared memory > so that other backends could adjust it directly, but IIUC that requires it > to be a fixed size, and the number of subscriptions is virtually unbounded. > True, if we want we can use dshash for this. The garbage collection mechanism used in the patch seems odd to me as that will remove/add entries to the hash table even when the corresponding subscription is never dropped. Also, adding this garbage collection each time seems like an overhead, especially for small values of wal_retrieve_retry_interval and a large number of subscriptions. Another point is immediately after cleaning the worker info, trying to find it again seems of no use. In logicalrep_worker_launch(), using both in_use and restart_immediately to find an unused slot doesn't look neat to me, we could probably keep the in_use flag intact if we want to reuse the worker. But again after freeing the worker, keeping its associated slot allocated sounds odd to me. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
Commits
-
Avoid type cheats for invalid dsa_handles and dshash_table_handles.
- 3b4ac33254e1 16.0 landed
-
Track logrep apply workers' last start times to avoid useless waits.
- 5a3a95385bd5 16.0 landed
-
Check for two_phase change at end of process_syncing_tables_for_apply.
- 4c032dd8046b 16.0 landed
-
Wake up a subscription's replication worker processes after DDL.
- c6e1f62e2cee 16.0 landed