Re: pgsql: Fix cardinality estimates for parallel joins.

Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org>
Cc: pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-01-16T12:23:52Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 12:07 AM, Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org> wrote:
> Fix cardinality estimates for parallel joins.
>

+       /*
+        * In the case of a parallel plan, the row count needs to represent
+        * the number of tuples processed per worker.
+        */
+       path->rows = clamp_row_est(path->rows / parallel_divisor);
    }

    path->startup_cost = startup_cost;
@@ -2014,6 +1996,10 @@ final_cost_nestloop(PlannerInfo *root, NestPath *path,
    else
        path->path.rows = path->path.parent->rows;

+   /* For partial paths, scale row estimate. */
+   if (path->path.parallel_workers > 0)
+       path->path.rows /= get_parallel_divisor(&path->path);


Isn't it better to call clamp_row_est in join costing functions as we
are doing in cost_seqscan()?  Is there a reason to keep those
different?

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com


Commits

  1. Fix failure to use clamp_row_est() for parallel joins.

  2. Fix cardinality estimates for parallel joins.