Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add a test for commit ac0e33136a using the injection point.
- 8a695d7998be 18.0 landed
-
Invalidate inactive replication slots.
- ac0e33136abc 18.0 landed
-
Fix incorrect slot type in BuildTupleHashTableExt
- d96d1d5152f3 18.0 cited
-
Allow synced slots to have their inactive_since.
- 6f132ed693b6 17.0 landed
-
Change last_inactive_time to inactive_since in pg_replication_slots.
- 6d49c8d4b4f4 17.0 landed
-
Track last_inactive_time in pg_replication_slots.
- a11f330b5584 17.0 landed
-
Track invalidation_reason in pg_replication_slots.
- 6ae701b4378d 17.0 landed
-
Add option force_initdb to PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster:init()
- ff9e1e764fcc 17.0 cited
-
Add a failover option to subscriptions.
- 776621a5e479 17.0 cited
-
Allow setting failover property in the replication command.
- 73292404370c 17.0 cited
-
Allow to enable failover property for replication slots via SQL API.
- c393308b69d2 17.0 cited
-
Track conflict_reason in pg_replication_slots.
- 007693f2a3ac 17.0 cited
-
Log messages for replication slot acquisition and release.
- 7c3fb505b14e 17.0 cited
-
Remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age
- 1118cd37eb61 16.0 cited
-
Fix corruption due to vacuum_defer_cleanup_age underflowing 64bit xids
- be504a3e974d 16.0 cited
-
meson: Add initial version of meson based build system
- e6927270cd18 16.0 cited
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 11:33 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > Some review comments for v72-0001. > > ====== > GENERAL > > My preference was to just keep the enum as per v70 for the *actual* > cause, and introduce a separate set of bit flags for *possible* causes > to be checked. This creates a clear code separation between the actual > and possible. It also eliminates the need to jump through hoops just > to map a cause to its name. > > You wrote: > > > OTOH, keeping the enums as they are in v70, and defining new macros > for the very similar purpose could add unnecessary complexity to code > management. > > Since both the enum and the bit flags would be defined in slot.h > adjacent to each other I don't foresee much complexity. I concede, a > dev might write code and accidentally muddle the enum instead of the > flag or vice versa but that's an example of sloppiness, not > complexity. Certainly there would be fewer necessary changes than what > are in the v72 patch due to all the cause/causename mappings. For > example, > > slot.h - Now, introduces a NEW typedef SlotInvalidationCauseMap > slot.h - Now, need extern for NEW function GetSlotInvalidationCauseName > > slot.c - Now, needed minor rewrite of GetSlotInvalidationCause instead > of leaving it as-is > slot.c - Now, needs a whole NEW looping function > GetSlotInvalidationCauseName instead of direct array index. > > Several place now must call to the GetSlotInvalidationCauseName where > previously a simple direct array lookup was done > slot.c - NEW call in ReplicationSlotAcquire > slotfuncs.c - NEW call in pg_get_replication_slots > > ~ > > FWIW, I've attached a topup patch using my idea just to see what it > might look like. The result was 20 lines less code. > I don't like the idea of maintaining the same information in two different ways (as enum and bit flags). We already have a few cases of defining bit flags as part of enums like ScanOptions and relopt_kind, so I feel following that model would be a better approach. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.