Re: Parallel copy
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Ants Aasma <ants@cybertec.at>, Alastair Turner <minion@decodable.me>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-02-26T10:54:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Allow WaitLatch() to be used without a latch.
- 733fa9aa51c5 14.0 cited
-
Add %P to log_line_prefix for parallel group leader
- b8fdee7d0ca8 14.0 cited
-
Include replication origins in SQL functions for commit timestamp
- b1e48bbe64a4 14.0 cited
-
Avoid useless buffer allocations during binary COPY FROM.
- cd22d3cdb9bd 14.0 cited
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 9:30 PM Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 05:09:51PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote: > >Hi, > > > >> The one piece of information I'm missing here is at least a very rough > >> quantification of the individual steps of CSV processing - for example > >> if parsing takes only 10% of the time, it's pretty pointless to start by > >> parallelising this part and we should focus on the rest. If it's 50% it > >> might be a different story. Has anyone done any measurements? > > > >Not recently, but I'm pretty sure that I've observed CSV parsing to be > >way more than 10%. > > > > Perhaps. I guess it'll depend on the CSV file (number of fields, ...), > so I still think we need to do some measurements first. > Agreed. > I'm willing to > do that, but (a) I doubt I'll have time for that until after 2020-03, > and (b) it'd be good to agree on some set of typical CSV files. > Right, I don't know what is the best way to define that. I can think of the below tests. 1. A table with 10 columns (with datatypes as integers, date, text). It has one index (unique/primary). Load with 1 million rows (basically the data should be probably 5-10 GB). 2. A table with 10 columns (with datatypes as integers, date, text). It has three indexes, one index can be (unique/primary). Load with 1 million rows (basically the data should be probably 5-10 GB). 3. A table with 10 columns (with datatypes as integers, date, text). It has three indexes, one index can be (unique/primary). It has before and after trigeers. Load with 1 million rows (basically the data should be probably 5-10 GB). 4. A table with 10 columns (with datatypes as integers, date, text). It has five or six indexes, one index can be (unique/primary). Load with 1 million rows (basically the data should be probably 5-10 GB). Among all these tests, we can check how much time did we spend in reading, parsing the csv files vs. rest of execution? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com