Horton

Re: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep

Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: "osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com" <osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Markus Wanner <markus.wanner@enterprisedb.com>
Date: 2021-06-03T10:07:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 9:18 AM osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com
<osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, June 1, 2021 4:33 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
> > To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
> > Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Amit Kapila
> > <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>; Markus Wanner
> > <markus.wanner@enterprisedb.com>
> > Subject: Re: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > The attached PG docs patch about catalog deadlocks was previously
> > implemented in another thread [1], but it seems more relevant to this one.
> >
> > PSA.
> Thank you for providing the patch.
> I have updated your patch to include some other viewpoints.
>

I suggest creating a synchronous replication part of the patch for
back-branches as well.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

Commits

  1. Doc: Update caveats in synchronous logical replication.

  2. Document a few caveats in synchronous logical replication.

  3. Update the docs and comments for decoding of prepared xacts.

  4. Allow decoding at prepare time in ReorderBuffer.

  5. Documentation for logical decoding.