Re: 024_add_drop_pub.pl might fail due to deadlock
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Cc: Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>,
Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-07-29T11:09:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 4:26 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 at 14:46, Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 1:13 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Yes, that makes sense to me. For HEAD and PG18, we can still add a new > > > argument to the API. For other bank branches, it is better to use a > > > new Ex function as suggested by Kuroda-San. > > > > > > > Here are the updated patches. > > I noticed the order of LockSharedObject and table lock is different > here compared to disable subscription: > Note that catalog tables are not the same. The DisableSubscription() takes lock on pg_subscrition catalog and then on a particular subscription using subscription_id. Here, we are first taking lock on a particular subscription and then on pg_subscription_rel. So, this seems to follow exactly the order which we should follow and I don't see any problem here. Please let us know if you have a specific concern. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
Commits
-
Fix a deadlock during ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... DROP PUBLICATION.
- 2ab2d6f97058 19 (unreleased) landed
- d9f01a287ab1 18.0 landed
- 434d2d147b58 15.14 landed
- 41fb3f51cb74 14.19 landed
- 8c298324a4f3 17.6 landed
- adfd8021911a 16.10 landed