Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 9:17 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 6:10 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 10:35 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 12:50 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I think the other kind of problem that can happen here is delete > > > > followed by an insert. If in the example provided by you, TX-1 > > > > performs delete (say it is large enough to cause streaming) and TX-2 > > > > performs insert then I think it will block the apply worker because > > > > insert will start waiting infinitely. Currently, I think it will lead > > > > to conflict due to insert but that is still solvable by allowing users > > > > to remove conflicting rows. > > > > > > > > It seems both these problems are due to the reason that the table on > > > > publisher and subscriber has different constraints otherwise, we would > > > > have seen the same behavior on the publisher as well. > > > > > > > > There could be a few ways to avoid these and similar problems: > > > > a. detect the difference in constraints between publisher and > > > > subscribers like primary key and probably others (like whether there > > > > is any volatile function present in index expression) when applying > > > > the change and then we give ERROR to the user that she must change the > > > > streaming mode to 'spill' instead of 'apply' (aka parallel apply). > > > > b. Same as (a) but instead of ERROR just LOG this information and > > > > change the mode to spill for the transactions that operate on that > > > > particular relation. > > > > > > Given that it doesn't introduce a new kind of problem I don't think we > > > need special treatment for that at least in this feature. > > > > > > > Isn't the problem related to infinite wait by insert as explained in > > my previous email (in the above-quoted text) a new kind of problem > > that won't exist in the current implementation? > > > > Sorry I had completely missed the point that the commit order won't be > changed. I agree that this new implementation would introduce a new > kind of issue as you mentioned above, and the opposite is not true. > > Regarding the case you explained in the previous email I also think it > will happen with the parallel apply feature. The apply worker will be > blocked until the conflict is resolved. I'm not sure how to avoid > that. It would be not easy to compare constraints between publisher > and subscribers when replicating partitioning tables. > I agree that partitioned tables need some more thought but in some simple cases where replication happens via individual partition tables (default), we can detect as we do for normal tables. OTOH, when replication happens via root (publish_via_partition_root) it could be tricky as the partitions could be different on both sides. I think the cases where we can't safely identify the constraint difference won't be considered for apply via a new bg worker. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix invalid memory access during the shutdown of the parallel apply worker.
- 3d144c6c8602 16.0 landed
-
Fix assertion failure in apply worker.
- de63f8dadee4 16.0 landed
-
Use elog to report unexpected action in handle_streamed_transaction().
- 781ac42d43ab 16.0 landed
-
Use appropriate wait event when sending data in the apply worker.
- d9d7fe68d35e 16.0 landed
-
Allow the logical_replication_mode to be used on the subscriber.
- 9f2213a7c575 16.0 landed
-
Rename GUC logical_decoding_mode to logical_replication_mode.
- 1e8b61735cfb 16.0 landed
-
Display the leader apply worker's PID for parallel apply workers.
- d540a02a724b 16.0 landed
-
Improve the code to decide and process the apply action.
- c981d9145dea 16.0 landed
-
Document the newly added wait events added by commit 216a784829.
- cd06ccd78fcf 16.0 landed
-
Perform apply of large transactions by parallel workers.
- 216a784829c2 16.0 landed
-
Wake up a subscription's replication worker processes after DDL.
- c6e1f62e2cee 16.0 cited
-
Add copyright notices to meson files
- 8284cf5f746f 16.0 cited
-
Better document logical replication parameters
- a8500750ca0a 16.0 cited
-
Add a common function to generate the origin name.
- 776e1c8a5d14 16.0 cited
-
Harmonize parameter names in storage and AM code.
- bfcf1b34805f 16.0 cited
-
Avoid using list_length() to test for empty list.
- efd0c16becbf 16.0 cited
-
Improve two comments related to a boolean DefElem's value
- 8445f5a21d40 16.0 cited
-
Fix partition table's REPLICA IDENTITY checking on the subscriber.
- 26b3455afaa9 15.0 cited
-
Fix data inconsistency between publisher and subscriber.
- b7658c24c7c1 15.0 cited
-
Fix cache look-up failures while applying changes in logical replication.
- 5a97b1325453 15.0 cited