Re: Logical Replication of sequences
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Doc: Add documentation for sequence synchronization.
- 55cefadde874 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove unused assignment in CREATE PUBLICATION grammar.
- bfb7419b0bbe 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add seq_sync_error_count to subscription statistics.
- f6a4c498dcf6 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix few issues in commit 5509055d69.
- 5a4eba558aa7 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add sequence synchronization for logical replication.
- 5509055d6956 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add worker type argument to logical replication worker functions.
- 3e8e05596a02 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Introduce "REFRESH SEQUENCES" for subscriptions.
- f0b3573c3aac 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Refactor logical worker synchronization code into a separate file.
- 41c674d2e31e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Standardize use of REFRESH PUBLICATION in code and messages.
- 2436b8c047ff 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add "ALL SEQUENCES" support to publications.
- 96b378497346 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Expose sequence page LSN via pg_get_sequence_data.
- b93172ca59f4 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Resume conflict-relevant data retention automatically.
- 0d48d393d465 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Post-commit review fixes for 228c370868.
- 1f7e9ba3ac4e 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Generate GUC tables from .dat file
- 63599896545c 19 (unreleased) cited
On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 10:53 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Vignesh, > > Here are a few review comments for patch 0001: > > ====== > src/backend/catalog/pg_subscription.c > > GetSubscriptionRelations: > > 1. > List * > -GetSubscriptionRelations(Oid subid, bool not_ready) > +GetSubscriptionRelations(Oid subid, bool otherwise return all the > relations of the subscription, bool get_sequences, > + bool not_ready) > > Now the function parameter means the (unchanged) function comment is > not correct anymore. > > e.g. It still says "otherwise return all the relations of the > subscription", but that does not account for the parameters indicating > if you only want tables, or only want sequences. > I think the code for those parameters is quite clear. The previous version had few comments but I found those unnecessary. > src/backend/replication/logical/syncutils.c > > 10. > bool > FetchRelationStates(bool *started_tx) > > IIUC, you are using the terminology "relations" to apply to both > tables or sequences; OTOH ", tables" is just tables. It seems this > function is table-specific. Should it have a name change like > FetchTableStates? > The patch 0002 has some changes related to sequences in this function. So, I think the current naming is okay. > ====== > src/test/subscription/t/036_sequences.pl > > 11. > There are no test cases checking that ALTER commands will correctly > add/remove sequences in the pg_subscription_rel? > The patch 0002 has tests related to ALTER commands. I don't think 0001 needs tests for all kinds of statements as both will be committed a few days apart. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.