Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 8:40 AM Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Can you please explain why you have the restriction for including >> replica identity columns and do we want to put a similar restriction >> for the primary key? As far as I understand, if we allow default >> values on subscribers for replica identity, then probably updates, >> deletes won't work as they need to use replica identity (or PK) to >> search the required tuple. If so, shouldn't we add this restriction >> only when a publication has been defined for one of these (Update, >> Delete) actions? > > > Yes, like you mentioned they are needed for Updates and Deletes to work. > The restriction for including replica identity columns in column filters exists because > In case the replica identity column values did not change, the old row replica identity columns > are not sent to the subscriber, thus we would need new replica identity columns > to be sent to identify the row that is to be Updated or Deleted. > I haven't tested if it would break Insert as well though. I will update the patch accordingly. > Okay, but then we also need to ensure that the user shouldn't be allowed to enable the 'update' or 'delete' for a publication that contains some filter that doesn't have replica identity columns. >> >> Another point is what if someone drops the column used in one of the >> publications? Do we want to drop the entire relation from publication >> or just remove the column filter or something else? >> > > Thanks for pointing this out. Currently, this is not handled in the patch. > I think dropping the column from the filter would make sense on the lines > of the table being dropped from publication, in case of drop table. > I think it would be tricky if you want to remove the column from the filter because you need to recompute the entire filter and update it again. Also, you might need to do this for all the publications that have a particular column in their filter clause. It might be easier to drop the entire filter but you can check if it is easier another way than it is good. >> >> Do we want to consider that the columns specified in the filter must >> not have NOT NULL constraint? Because, otherwise, the subscriber will >> error out inserting such rows? >> > I think you mean columns *not* specified in the filter must not have NOT NULL constraint > on the subscriber, as this will break during insert, as it will try to insert NULL for columns > not sent by the publisher. > Right. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Doc: Explain about Column List feature.
- f98d07424523 16.0 landed
- 25996a82a446 15.0 landed
-
Doc: fix column list vs. replica identity rules.
- 376af686111e 16.0 landed
- ab3131880d8a 15.0 landed
-
Prohibit combining publications with different column lists.
- fd0b9dcebda7 15.0 cited
-
Fix the check to limit sync workers.
- be46985bed8a 10.21 landed
- a90de822e483 11.16 landed
- 59348fbdeb7b 12.11 landed
- 82d4a17a1750 13.7 landed
- c9dea58e2702 14.3 landed
- dd4ab6fd6528 15.0 landed
-
Wait for subscription to sync in t/031_column_list.sql
- 404f49338fef 15.0 landed
-
Move prattrs to the pg_publication_rel section in docs
- 41b00f8e601f 15.0 landed
-
Allow specifying column lists for logical replication
- 923def9a533a 15.0 landed
-
Fix row filters with multiple publications
- 5a079662256e 15.0 landed
-
Fix publish_as_relid with multiple publications
- 27fafee72d17 13.7 landed
- 677a1dc0ca0f 14.3 landed
- c91f71b9dc91 15.0 landed
-
Add some additional tests for row filters in logical replication.
- ceb57afd3ce1 15.0 cited
-
Add index on pg_publication_rel.prpubid
- 025b920a3d45 15.0 landed
-
Avoid using DefElemAction in AlterPublicationStmt
- 9623d8999603 15.0 landed
-
Small cleanups related to PUBLICATION framework code
- c9105dd3660f 15.0 landed
-
Add PublicationTable and PublicationRelInfo structs
- 0c6828fa987b 15.0 landed
-
Fix various concurrency issues in logical replication worker launching
- de4389712206 10.0 cited