Re: logical decoding : exceeded maxAllocatedDescs for .spill files

Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera from 2ndQuadrant <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo.santamaria@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: 2019-12-24T05:11:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. When a TAP file has non-zero exit status, retain temporary directories.

  2. Fix running out of file descriptors for spill files.

  3. Track statistics for spilling of changes from ReorderBuffer.

  4. Handle ReadFile() EOF correctly on Windows.

  5. Add logical_decoding_work_mem to limit ReorderBuffer memory usage.

  6. Generational memory allocator

  7. Support retaining data dirs on successful TAP tests

On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 9:31 AM Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
> Attached are the patches from master back up to 94 branch.
>
> PG 9.4 and 9.5 have a common patch to be applied :
> pg94_95_use_vfd_for_logrep.patch
> From PG 9.6 onwards, each version has a separate patch.
>
> For PG 9.6, there is no logical decoding perl test file. So I have
> made a new file 006_logical_decoding_spill.pl that has only the
> specific testcase. Also, for building the test_decoding.so, I had to
> add the EXTRA_INSTALL=contrib/test_decoding line in the
> src/test/recovery/Makefile, because this is the first time we are
> using the plugin in the 9.6 tap test.
>

I am not sure if we need to go that far for 9.6 branch.  If the other
tests for logical decoding are not present, then I don't see why we
need to create a new test file for this test only.  Also, I think this
will make the patch the same for 9.4,9.5 and 9.6.

> From PG 10 onwards, pgstat_report_*() calls around read() are removed
> in the patch, because FileRead() itself reports the wait events.
>

Why there are different patches for 10 and 11?

We should try to minimize the difference between patches in different branches.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com