Horton

Re: doc: update PL/pgSQL sample loop function

Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Ian Barwick <ian.barwick@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Date: 2019-09-11T05:44:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 9:09 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The current example shows the usage of looping in plpgsql, so as such
> there is no correctness issue, but OTOH there is no harm in updating
> the example as proposed by Ian Barwick.  Does anyone else see any
> problem with this idea?  If we agree to proceed with this update, it
> might be better to backpatch it for the sake of consistency though I
> am not sure about that.
>

While checking the patch in back-branches, I noticed that it doesn't
get applied to 9.4 due to the way the example forms the string.  I
have done the required changes for 9.4 as well and attached is the
result.

Ian, if possible, can you once check the patch for 9.4?

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Commits

  1. Doc: Update PL/pgSQL sample function in plpgsql.sgml.