Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation

Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Cc: Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>, shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-02-07T05:52:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Add a test for commit ac0e33136a using the injection point.

  2. Invalidate inactive replication slots.

  3. Fix incorrect slot type in BuildTupleHashTableExt

  4. Allow synced slots to have their inactive_since.

  5. Change last_inactive_time to inactive_since in pg_replication_slots.

  6. Track last_inactive_time in pg_replication_slots.

  7. Track invalidation_reason in pg_replication_slots.

  8. Add option force_initdb to PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster:init()

  9. Add a failover option to subscriptions.

  10. Allow setting failover property in the replication command.

  11. Allow to enable failover property for replication slots via SQL API.

  12. Track conflict_reason in pg_replication_slots.

  13. Log messages for replication slot acquisition and release.

  14. Remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age

  15. Fix corruption due to vacuum_defer_cleanup_age underflowing 64bit xids

  16. meson: Add initial version of meson based build system

On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 8:00 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ======
> src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
>
> 1.
>   XLByteToSeg(RedoRecPtr, _logSegNo, wal_segment_size);
>   KeepLogSeg(recptr, &_logSegNo);
> - if (InvalidateObsoleteReplicationSlots(RS_INVAL_WAL_REMOVED,
> + if (InvalidateObsoleteReplicationSlots(RS_INVAL_WAL_REMOVED |
> RS_INVAL_IDLE_TIMEOUT,
>      _logSegNo, InvalidOid,
>      InvalidTransactionId))
>   {
> @@ -7792,7 +7792,7 @@ CreateRestartPoint(int flags)
>   replayPtr = GetXLogReplayRecPtr(&replayTLI);
>   endptr = (receivePtr < replayPtr) ? replayPtr : receivePtr;
>   KeepLogSeg(endptr, &_logSegNo);
> - if (InvalidateObsoleteReplicationSlots(RS_INVAL_WAL_REMOVED,
> + if (InvalidateObsoleteReplicationSlots(RS_INVAL_WAL_REMOVED |
> RS_INVAL_IDLE_TIMEOUT,
>      _logSegNo, InvalidOid,
>      InvalidTransactionId))
>
> It seems fundamentally strange to me to assign multiple simultaneous
> causes like this. IMO you can't invalidate something that is invalid
> already. I gues v71 was an attempt to implement Amit's:
>

The idea is to invalidate the slot either due to WAL_REMOVED or
IDLE_TIMEOUT in one go during the checkpoint instead of taking
multiple passes over the slots during the checkpoint. Feel free to
suggest if you can think of a better way to implement it.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.