Re: repeated decoding of prepared transactions
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@enterprisedb.com>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>, Markus Wanner <markus.wanner@enterprisedb.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@enterprisedb.com>
Date: 2021-02-15T03:54:13Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 10:23 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > > On 2021-02-13 17:37:29 +0100, Petr Jelinek wrote: > > > AFAIK this is exactly why origins are Wal logged along with > > transaction, it allows us to guarantee never getting anything that has > > beed durably written. > > I think you'd need something like origins in that case, because > something could still go wrong before the other side has received the > flush (network disconnect, primary crash, ...). > We are already using origins in apply-worker to guarantee that and with each commit, the origin's lsn location is also WAL-logged. That helps us to send the start location for a slot after the restart. As far as I understand this is how it works from the apply-worker side. I am not sure if I am missing something here? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
Commits
-
Add option to enable two_phase commits via pg_create_logical_replication_slot.
- 19890a064ebf 14.0 landed
-
Avoid repeated decoding of prepared transactions after a restart.
- 8bdb1332eb51 14.0 landed
-
Allow decoding at prepare time in ReorderBuffer.
- a271a1b50e9b 14.0 cited