Re: [PATCH] Provide more information to filter_prepare
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Markus Wanner <markus.wanner@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-03-11T03:58:45Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 4:26 PM Markus Wanner <markus.wanner@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > On 10.03.21 11:18, Amit Kapila wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 2:14 PM Markus Wanner > > <markus.wanner@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> currently, only the gid is passed on to the filter_prepare callback. > >> While we probably should not pass a full ReorderBufferTXN (as we do for > >> most other output plugin callbacks), a bit more information would be > >> nice, I think. > > > > How the proposed 'xid' parameter can be useful? What exactly plugins > > want to do with it? > > The xid is the very basic identifier for transactions in Postgres. Any > output plugin that interacts with Postgres in any way slightly more > interesting than "filter by gid prefix" is very likely to come across a > TransactionId. > > It allows for basics like checking if the transaction to decode still is > in progress, for example. > But this happens when we are decoding prepare, so it is clear that the transaction is prepared, why any additional check? > Or in a much more complex scenario, decide on > whether or not to filter based on properties the extension stored during > processing the transaction. > What in this can't be done with GID and how XID can achieve it? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
Commits
-
Add a xid argument to the filter_prepare callback for output plugins.
- f64ea6dc5c8c 14.0 landed