Re: Potential data loss due to race condition during logical replication slot creation
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, "Callahan,
Drew" <callaan@amazon.com>, "pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-03-19T02:33:06Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 7:46 AM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > I think the approach was most conservative one which does not have to change > the version of the snapshot. However, I understood that you wanted to consider > the optimized solution for HEAD first. > Right, let's see if we can have a solution other than always avoiding restoring snapshots during slot creation even if that is for just HEAD. > > See SnapBuildCommitTxn(). Can we avoid this problem if we > > would have list of all running xacts when we serialize the snapshot by > > not decoding any xact whose xid lies in that list? If so, one idea to > > achieve could be that we maintain the highest_running_xid while > > serailizing the snapshot and then during restore if that > > highest_running_xid is <= builder->initial_xmin_horizon, then we > > ignore restoring the snapshot. We already have few such cases handled > > in SnapBuildRestore(). > > Based on the idea, I made a prototype. It can pass tests added by others and me. > How do other think? > Won't it be possible to achieve the same thing if we just save (serialize) the highest xid among all running xacts? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
Commits
-
Fix possibility of logical decoding partial transaction changes.
- bb19b70081e2 18.0 landed
- 068674f4ab44 17.0 landed
- 2f3304ce133f 16.4 landed
- aee8c2b95492 15.8 landed
- f7d3caf9ddbf 14.13 landed
- cf2c69ec5a5b 13.16 landed
- 1b370758770c 12.20 landed