Re: Logical Replication of sequences

Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

To: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>

Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>, Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>, Hou, Zhijie/侯志杰 <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>, "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>

Date: 2024-06-20T13:14:50Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

Doc: Add documentation for sequence synchronization.
- 55cefadde874 19 (unreleased) landed
Remove unused assignment in CREATE PUBLICATION grammar.
- bfb7419b0bbe 19 (unreleased) landed
Add seq_sync_error_count to subscription statistics.
- f6a4c498dcf6 19 (unreleased) landed
Fix few issues in commit 5509055d69.
- 5a4eba558aa7 19 (unreleased) landed
Add sequence synchronization for logical replication.
- 5509055d6956 19 (unreleased) landed
Add worker type argument to logical replication worker functions.
- 3e8e05596a02 19 (unreleased) landed
Introduce "REFRESH SEQUENCES" for subscriptions.
- f0b3573c3aac 19 (unreleased) landed
Refactor logical worker synchronization code into a separate file.
- 41c674d2e31e 19 (unreleased) landed
Standardize use of REFRESH PUBLICATION in code and messages.
- 2436b8c047ff 19 (unreleased) landed
Add "ALL SEQUENCES" support to publications.
- 96b378497346 19 (unreleased) landed
Expose sequence page LSN via pg_get_sequence_data.
- b93172ca59f4 19 (unreleased) landed
Resume conflict-relevant data retention automatically.
- 0d48d393d465 19 (unreleased) cited
Post-commit review fixes for 228c370868.
- 1f7e9ba3ac4e 19 (unreleased) cited
Generate GUC tables from .dat file
- 63599896545c 19 (unreleased) cited

On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 8:33 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 at 16:10, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Agreed and I am not sure which is better because there is a value in
> > keeping the state name the same for both sequences and tables. We
> > probably need more comments in code and doc updates to make the
> > behavior clear. We can start with the sequence state as 'init' for
> > 'needs-to-be-sycned' and 'ready' for 'synced' and can change if others
> > feel so during the review.
>
> Here is a patch which does the sequence synchronization in the
> following lines from the above discussion:
>

Thanks for summarizing the points discussed. I would like to confirm
whether the patch replicates new sequences that are created
implicitly/explicitly for a publication defined as ALL SEQUENCES.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.