Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?

Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

To: Julien Rouhaud <julien.rouhaud@dalibo.com>

Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2016-06-29T06:51:37Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Julien Rouhaud
<julien.rouhaud@dalibo.com> wrote:
> Or should we allow setting it to -1 for instance to disable the limit?
>

By disabling the limit, do you mean to say that only
max_parallel_workers_per_gather will determine the workers required or
something else?  If earlier, then I am not sure if it is good idea,
because it can cause some confusion to the user about usage of both
the parameters together.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com