Re: speed up a logical replica setup

Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Cc: Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>, "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>, Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Date: 2024-06-28T05:11:42Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. pg_createsubscriber: Remove obsolete comment

  2. pg_createsubscriber: Fix an unpredictable recovery wait time.

  3. Fix unstable test in 040_pg_createsubscriber.

  4. Fix the testcase introduced in commit 81d20fbf7a.

  5. Further weaken new pg_createsubscriber test on Windows.

  6. Temporarily(?) weaken new pg_createsubscriber test on Windows.

  7. Make pg_createsubscriber warn if publisher has two-phase commit enabled.

  8. Make pg_createsubscriber more wary about quoting connection parameters.

  9. pg_createsubscriber: Remove failover replication slots on subscriber

  10. pg_createsubscriber: Remove replication slot check on primary

  11. pg_createsubscriber: Only --recovery-timeout controls the end of recovery process

  12. pg_createsubscriber: creates a new logical replica from a standby server

  13. Add some const decorations

  14. Add option force_initdb to PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster:init()

  15. Remove MSVC scripts

Attachments

On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 11:35 AM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
<kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for giving comment! 0001 was modified per suggestions.
>
> > Yeah, it is a good idea to add a new option for two_phase but that
> > should be done in the next version. For now, I suggest updating the
> > docs and probably raising a warning (if max_prepared_transactions !=
> > 0) as suggested by Noah. This WARNING is useful because one could
> > expect that setting max_prepared_transactions != 0 means apply will
> > happen at prepare time after the subscriber is created by this tool.
> > The WARNING will be useful even if we support two_phase option as the
> > user may have set the non-zero value of max_prepared_transactions but
> > didn't use two_phase option.
>
> I also think it should be tunable, in PG18+. 0002 adds a description in doc.
> Also, this executable warns if the max_prepared_transactions != 0 on the
> publisher.
>

I have slightly adjusted the doc update and warning message for the
0002 patch. Please see attached and let me know what do you think.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.