Re: Have pg_basebackup write "dbname" in "primary_conninfo"?
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-03-20T11:39:21Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- pg_basebackup-write-dbname.v0007.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v7
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 5:18 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > Thanks for giving comments! > > > This behavior makes sense to me. But do we want to handle the case of > > using environment variables too? > > Yeah, v5 does not consider which libpq parameters are specified by environment > variables. Such a variable should be used when the dbname is not expressly written > in the connection string. > Such a path was added in the v6 patch. If the dbname is not determined after > parsing the connection string, we call PQconndefaults() to get settings from > environment variables and service files [1], then start to search dbname again. > The functionality implemented by the patch looks good to me. I have made minor modifications in the function names, error handling, comments, and doc updates in the attached patch. Let me know what you think of the attached. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
Commits
-
Allow dbname to be written as part of connstring via pg_basebackup's -R option.
- a145f424d524 17.0 landed
-
Allow dbname in pg_basebackup/pg_receivewal connstring
- cca97ce6a665 17.0 cited