Horton

Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?

Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@enterprisedb.com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-02-10T05:32:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 7:41 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 10:38 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
>
> PSA v2 of this WalRcvExceResult patch (it is same as v1 but includes
> some PG doc updates).
> This applies OK on top of v30 of the main patch.
>

Thanks, I have integrated these changes into the main patch and
additionally made some changes to comments and docs. I have also fixed
the function name inconsistency issue you reported and ran pgindent.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

Commits

  1. Fix relcache reference leak introduced by ce0fdbfe97.

  2. Fix Subscription test added by commit ce0fdbfe97.

  3. Allow multiple xacts during table sync in logical replication.

  4. Logical replication support for initial data copy