Re: wake up logical workers after ALTER SUBSCRIPTION
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Cc: Melih Mutlu <m.melihmutlu@gmail.com>,
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-01-05T06:04:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 10:16 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 08:12:37PM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 09:09:12AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > >> But there doesn't appear to be any guarantee that the result for > >> AllTablesyncsReady() will change between the time it is invoked > >> earlier in the function and at the place you have it in the patch. > >> This is because the value of 'table_states_valid' may not have > >> changed. So, how is this supposed to work? > > > > The call to CommandCounterIncrement() should set table_states_valid to > > false if needed. > > In v12, I moved the restart for two_phase mode to the end of > process_syncing_tables_for_apply() so that we don't need to rely on another > iteration of the loop. > This should work but it is better to add a comment before calling CommandCounterIncrement() to indicate that this is for making changes to the relation state visible. Thinking along similar lines, won't apply worker need to be notified of SUBREL_STATE_SYNCWAIT state change by the tablesync worker? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
Commits
-
Avoid type cheats for invalid dsa_handles and dshash_table_handles.
- 3b4ac33254e1 16.0 landed
-
Track logrep apply workers' last start times to avoid useless waits.
- 5a3a95385bd5 16.0 landed
-
Check for two_phase change at end of process_syncing_tables_for_apply.
- 4c032dd8046b 16.0 landed
-
Wake up a subscription's replication worker processes after DDL.
- c6e1f62e2cee 16.0 landed