Re: Documentation and code don't agree about partitioned table UPDATEs

On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 4:57 PM David Rowley
<david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 at 16:20, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I agree that the docs need to be updated and this patch should be
> > backpatched as well.  However, I think the older wording was more
> > descriptive and clear, so I have modified your patch a bit to retain
> > part of old wording, see the result as attached.
>
> I have to admit, I was quite fond of the original text, at least when
> it was true.  Your alteration of it seems pretty good to me too.
>

Thanks, pushed!

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com