Re: row filtering for logical replication
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Release cache tuple when no longer needed
- ed0fbc8e5ac9 15.0 landed
-
Add some additional tests for row filters in logical replication.
- ceb57afd3ce1 15.0 landed
-
Fix one of the tests introduced in commit 52e4f0cd47.
- cfb4e209ec15 15.0 landed
-
Allow specifying row filters for logical replication of tables.
- 52e4f0cd472d 15.0 landed
-
Move scanint8() to numutils.c
- cfc7191dfea3 15.0 cited
-
Replace Test::More plans with done_testing
- 549ec201d613 15.0 cited
-
Reduce relcache access in WAL sender streaming logical changes
- 6ce16088bfed 15.0 cited
-
Small cleanups related to PUBLICATION framework code
- c9105dd3660f 15.0 cited
-
Add a view to show the stats of subscription workers.
- 8d74fc96db5f 15.0 cited
-
Allow publishing the tables of schema.
- 5a2832465fd8 15.0 cited
-
Doc: improve documentation of CREATE/ALTER SUBSCRIPTION.
- 1882d6cca161 15.0 cited
-
Add PublicationTable and PublicationRelInfo structs
- 0c6828fa987b 15.0 cited
-
Remove unused argument "txn" in maybe_send_schema().
- 93d573d86571 15.0 cited
-
Add prepare API support for streaming transactions in logical replication.
- 63cf61cdeb7b 15.0 cited
-
Unify PostgresNode's new() and get_new_node() methods
- 201a76183e20 15.0 cited
-
Use l*_node() family of functions where appropriate
- 2b00db4fb0c7 15.0 cited
-
Add support for prepared transactions to built-in logical replication.
- a8fd13cab0ba 15.0 cited
-
Restore the portal-level snapshot after procedure COMMIT/ROLLBACK.
- ef9480509622 11.13 cited
-
Rename a parse node to be more general
- 91d1f2d30210 14.0 landed
-
Remove unused column atttypmod from initial tablesync query
- 4ad31bb2ef25 14.0 landed
-
SEARCH and CYCLE clauses
- 3696a600e229 14.0 cited
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 3:31 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 9:13 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 3:41 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Apart from Truncate, it will also be a waste if any error happens > > before actually evaluating the filter, tomorrow there could be other > > operations like replication of sequences (I have checked that proposed > > patch for sequences uses get_rel_sync_entry) where we don't need to > > build ExprState (as filters might or might not be there). So, it would > > be better to avoid cache lookups in those cases if possible. I still > > think doing expensive things like preparing expressions should ideally > > be done only when it is required. > > OK. Per your suggestion, I will try to move as much of the row-filter > cache code as possible out of the get_rel_sync_entry function and into > the pgoutput_row_filter function. > I could think of more scenarios where doing this work in get_rel_sync_entry() could cost us without any actual need for it. Consider, the user has published only 'update' and 'delete' operation for a publication, then in the system there are inserts followed truncate or any ddl which generates invalidation, for such a case, for each change we need to rebuild the row_filters but we won't use it. Similarly, this can happen in any other combination of DML and DDL operations where the DML operation is not published. I don't want to say that this is the most common scenario but it is important to do expensive work when it is actually required, otherwise, there could be cases where it might hit us. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.