Re: speed up a logical replica setup
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
pg_createsubscriber: Remove obsolete comment
- 71795d1cb41b 17.0 landed
- 1330843bb78e 18.0 landed
-
pg_createsubscriber: Fix an unpredictable recovery wait time.
- e5ba6a5ab62c 17.0 landed
- 03b08c8f5f3e 18.0 landed
-
Fix unstable test in 040_pg_createsubscriber.
- ae4e072bad5f 17.0 landed
- 9fd8b331dfe1 18.0 landed
-
Fix the testcase introduced in commit 81d20fbf7a.
- ae395f0f7edb 18.0 landed
- 14387ab06503 17.0 landed
-
Further weaken new pg_createsubscriber test on Windows.
- 55c309fc5b08 17.0 landed
- a1333ec048fb 18.0 landed
-
Temporarily(?) weaken new pg_createsubscriber test on Windows.
- 54508209178b 17.0 landed
-
Make pg_createsubscriber warn if publisher has two-phase commit enabled.
- 917754557cc0 17.0 landed
-
Make pg_createsubscriber more wary about quoting connection parameters.
- b3f5ccebd79d 17.0 landed
-
pg_createsubscriber: Remove failover replication slots on subscriber
- 81d20fbf7a03 17.0 landed
-
pg_createsubscriber: Remove replication slot check on primary
- b96391382626 17.0 landed
-
pg_createsubscriber: Only --recovery-timeout controls the end of recovery process
- 04c8634c0c4d 17.0 landed
-
pg_createsubscriber: creates a new logical replica from a standby server
- d44032d01463 17.0 landed
-
Add some const decorations
- 48018f1d8c12 17.0 landed
-
Add option force_initdb to PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster:init()
- ff9e1e764fcc 17.0 cited
-
Remove MSVC scripts
- 1301c80b2167 17.0 cited
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 9:23 AM Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com> wrote:
>
Did you consider adding options for publication/subscription/slot
names as mentioned in my previous email? As discussed in a few emails
above, it would be quite confusing for users to identify the logical
replication objects once the standby is converted to subscriber.
*
+static void
+cleanup_objects_atexit(void)
{
...
conn = connect_database(dbinfo[i].pubconninfo, false);
+ if (conn != NULL)
+ {
+ if (dbinfo[i].made_publication)
+ drop_publication(conn, &dbinfo[i]);
+ if (dbinfo[i].made_replslot)
+ drop_replication_slot(conn, &dbinfo[i], dbinfo[i].subname);
+ disconnect_database(conn, false);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ /*
+ * If a connection could not be established, inform the user
+ * that some objects were left on primary and should be
+ * removed before trying again.
+ */
+ if (dbinfo[i].made_publication)
+ {
+ pg_log_warning("There might be a publication \"%s\" in database
\"%s\" on primary",
+ dbinfo[i].pubname, dbinfo[i].dbname);
+ pg_log_warning_hint("Consider dropping this publication before
trying again.");
+ }
It seems we care only for publications created on the primary. Isn't
it possible that some of the publications have been replicated to
standby by that time, for example, in case failure happens after
creating a few publications? IIUC, we don't care for standby cleanup
after failure because it can't be used for streaming replication
anymore. So, the only choice the user has is to recreate the standby
and start the pg_createsubscriber again. This sounds questionable to
me as to whether users would like this behavior. Does anyone else have
an opinion on this point?
I see the below note in the patch:
+ If <application>pg_createsubscriber</application> fails while processing,
+ then the data directory is likely not in a state that can be recovered. It
+ is true if the target server was promoted. In such a case, creating a new
+ standby server is recommended.
By reading this it is not completely clear whether the standby is not
recoverable in case of any error or only an error after the target
server is promoted. If others agree with this behavior then we should
write the detailed reason for this somewhere in the comments as well
unless it is already explained.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.