Re: Enhances pg_createsubscriber documentation for the -d option.
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-02-27T08:37:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 4:48 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 at 14:35, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > How about changing it slightly as follows to make it clear: "If > > <option>-d</option>option is not provided, the database name will be > > obtained from <option>-P</option>. If the database name is not > > specified in either the <option>-d</option> option or > > <option>-P</option>, an error will be reported."? > > Looks good to me, here is an updated v2 version with the changes. > Pushed. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
Commits
-
Doc: Additional clarification for -d option of pg_createsubscriber.
- 845511a72ad0 18.0 landed