Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions

Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-10-24T13:37:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Tighten the concurrent abort check during decoding.

  2. Improve hash_create()'s API for some added robustness.

  3. Use HASH_BLOBS for xidhash.

  4. Fix initialization of RelationSyncEntry for streaming transactions.

  5. Remove unused function declaration in logicalproto.h.

  6. Add additional tests to test streaming of in-progress transactions.

  7. Fix inline marking introduced in commit 464824323e.

  8. Add support for streaming to built-in logical replication.

  9. Fix the SharedFileSetUnregister API.

  10. Fix comment in procarray.c

  11. Suppress compiler warning in non-cassert builds.

  12. Extend the BufFile interface.

  13. Mark a few logical decoding related variables with PGDLLIMPORT.

  14. Implement streaming mode in ReorderBuffer.

  15. Extend the logical decoding output plugin API with stream methods.

  16. WAL Log invalidations at command end with wal_level=logical.

  17. Immediately WAL-log subtransaction and top-level XID association.

  18. Allow logical replication to transfer data in binary format.

  19. Only superuser can set sslcert/sslkey in postgres_fdw user mappings

  20. Track statistics for spilling of changes from ReorderBuffer.

  21. Add logical_decoding_work_mem to limit ReorderBuffer memory usage.

  22. logical decoding: process ASSIGNMENT during snapshot build

  23. Emit invalidations to standby for transactions without xid.

On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:30 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have merged bugs_and_review_comments_fix.patch changes to 0001 and 0002.
>

I was wondering whether we have checked the code coverage after this
patch?  Previously, the existing tests seem to be covering most parts
of the function ReorderBufferSerializeTXN [1].  After this patch, the
timing to call ReorderBufferSerializeTXN will change, so that might
impact the testing of the same.  If it is already covered, then I
would like to either add a new test or extend existing test with the
help of new spill counters.  If it is not getting covered, then we
need to think of extending the existing test or write a new test to
cover the function ReorderBufferSerializeTXN.

[1] - https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/backend/replication/logical/reorderbuffer.c.gcov.html

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com