Re: IndexTupleDSize macro seems redundant
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Ildar Musin <i.musin@postgrespro.ru>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-11-21T14:26:11Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Ildar Musin <i.musin@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > Hi all, > > While I was looking through the indexes code I got confused by couple of > macros - IndexTupleSize() and IndexTupleDSize() - which seem to do the same > thing with only difference that the first one takes pointer as an argument > while the second one takes struct. And in most cases IndexTupleDSize() is > used with dereferencing of index tuple where IndexTupleSize() would suit > perfectly. Is there a particular reason to have them both? I've made a patch > that removes IndexTupleDSize macro. All the tests have passed. > +1. I was also once confused with these macros. I think this is a good cleanup. On a quick look, I don't see any problem with your changes. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Commits
-
Remove redundant IndexTupleDSize macro.
- d79e7e92bf2a 11.0 landed