Horton

Re: Enumize logical replication message actions

Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@2ndquadrant.com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-11-26T04:45:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 2:52 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 2:26 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Hackers.
> >
> > Last month there was a commit [1] for replacing logical replication
> > message type characters with enums of equivalent values.
> >
> > I was revisiting this code recently and I think due to oversight that
> > initial patch was incomplete. IIUC there are several more enum
> > substitutions which should have been made.
> >
> > PSA my patch which adds those missing substitutions.
> >
>
> Good catch. I'll review it in a day or so.
>

The patch looks good to me and I have pushed it.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

Commits

  1. Use Enums for logical replication message types at more places.

  2. Use Enum for top level logical replication message types.