Thread

Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]

Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> — 2026-05-10T11:24:29Z

On Fri, May 8, 2026 at 7:28 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>
> On 2026-May-08, Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> > Some issues/inefficiencies regarding this fix and base code related to
> > db-specific snapshots built during decoding: [...]
>
> Thanks for spending time reviewing this code.  I think none of these
> problems are fundamental in nature, but they are obviously worth
> addressing for 19.  If we hit some roadblock, we can still revert only
> db-specific snapshots.
>

IIUC, the emails by Andres [1][2] on db-specific snapshots sound like
concerns which are fundamental in nature. Apart from that as well, I
think the first point mentioned in my email [3] should be at least
addressed as that causes additional WAL even after reaching
consistent_state for each runing_xact record for a db-specific
decoder.

[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/cdgw4sbbfcgk6du3iv54r2dgiy4tfywoklbotlmj4irxavdcr3%40glxfw5jj277q
[2] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/pveffyxhnuurhb44uzqlwo3rkyzorkfh2rot7uwzlf2axhfvbp%407nrs2omysxkc
[3] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1LygCDP3FiFzXY9iVNFcHxhf7TT_DFf7tryTu2oipmfpA%40mail.gmail.com

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.