Re: logical decoding : exceeded maxAllocatedDescs for .spill files
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera from 2ndQuadrant <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo.santamaria@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: 2019-12-19T06:29:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
When a TAP file has non-zero exit status, retain temporary directories.
- 048c7ccd7d6d 9.6.17 landed
- d8efc5900f7c 10.12 landed
- 887657d183fc 11.7 landed
- 78a26c3edd85 12.2 landed
- bf989aaf3561 13.0 landed
-
Fix running out of file descriptors for spill files.
- 1ad47e8757bb 9.4.26 landed
- a6f4f407ada0 9.5.21 landed
- 27b5f48c79f7 10.12 landed
- 3e3a79735235 11.7 landed
- f8a6d8e71b17 12.2 landed
- d20703805383 13.0 landed
- ba5b4e506489 9.6.17 landed
-
Track statistics for spilling of changes from ReorderBuffer.
- 9290ad198b15 13.0 cited
-
Handle ReadFile() EOF correctly on Windows.
- 2189f49c420f 12.2 landed
- 6969deeb8d39 13.0 landed
-
Add logical_decoding_work_mem to limit ReorderBuffer memory usage.
- cec2edfa7859 13.0 cited
-
Generational memory allocator
- a4ccc1cef5a0 11.0 cited
-
Support retaining data dirs on successful TAP tests
- 90627cf98a8e 11.0 cited
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 12:34 PM Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 17:40, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com> wrote: > > By the way, the backport patch is turning out to be simpler. It's > > because in pre-12 versions, the file offset is part of the Vfd > > structure, so all the offset handling is not required. > > Please have a look at the attached backport patch for PG 11. branch. > Once you are ok with the patch, I will port it on other branches. > Note that in the patch, wherever applicable I have renamed the fd > variable to vfd to signify that it is a vfd, and not the kernel fd. If > we don't do the renaming, the patch would be still smaller, but I > think the renaming makes sense. > The other usage of PathNameOpenFile in md.c is already using 'fd' as a variable name (also, if you see example in fd.h, that also uses fd as variable name), so I don't see any problem with using fd especially if that leads to lesser changes. Apart from that, your patch LGTM. > The recovery TAP tests don't seem to be there on 9.4 and 9.5 branch, > so I think it's ok to not have any tests with the patches on these > branches that don't have the tap tests. > Yeah, that is fine. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com